Is the avant garde passé?

Has avant garde art gone mainstream? If so, has it lost its edge? What does it mean for art to be political at a time when politics itself is so uninspiring?

Ralph Ginzburg launched the magazine Avant Garde in January 1968, with a view to combining art and politics. As the year unfolded, radical politics and avant garde art seemed to go hand-in-hand. In 2008 London’s South Bank Centre hosted an exhibition of the street posters of Paris from May 68. This innovative, political work took its inspiration from the avant garde traditions of the 19th century Parisian Salon des Refusés, and later experimental art that pushed the boundaries of ‘bourgeois’ form.

40 years on, many artists are seen as cutting-edge and politically radical, but the context has changed. Modernism has been usurped by postmodernism, and the idea of subverting form is so commonplace that many art-lovers long for assured technique. Meanwhile, culture mandarins practically demand the arts demonstrate their social relevance, and ‘bourgeois’ institutions eschew ‘art for art’s sake’, preferring the politically-oriented work of Mark Wallinger or Banksy.

Has avant garde art gone mainstream? If so, has it lost its edge? What does it mean for art to be political at a time when politics itself is so uninspiring? Some critics condemn what they see as the vacuousness of ever more outlandish attempts to create art sensation for the sake of it. Are they simply retreating to nostalgia for past excellence, or should we demand art that is genuinely fresh and innovative, whether it’s political or not? What should avant garde art look like in 2008?

Register to tell a friend about this lecture.

Comments

If you would like to comment about this lecture, please register here.

©2003-2006 Niminim Limited. Created by

Any ad revenue is entirely reinvested into the Lecture List's operating fund